Your Humanitarian Convoy Is Cordially Invited...

Biased BBC, like its evil twin the real BBC, deploys a range of specialist correspondents to help us make sense of the worst al-Beeb treachery. The longest-serving of these is sue, who monitors Middle Eastern madness. Today she finds the BBC guilty of heinous offences whilst covering George Galloway MP and his controversial convoy to Gaza:

The treacherous MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, George Galloway has been away from his constituency lately.

Tower Hamlets in deep winter. What's not to like, George?

His recent publicity-seeking escapade, getting a convoy of aid to the Palestinians who are currently perceived to be imprisoned in Gaza and starving, has even antagonised the Egyptians.

Indeed. But where's the BBC bad-assery? I've got an angry email ready to send to Whinge Central.

“ The Egyptian foreign ministry launched a scathing attack on convoy leader British Respect MP George Galloway, claiming that his comments regarding the hold up of the convoy defied “honesty and facts.” “Being aware that Mr. Galloway loves media exposure, for various reasons, the ministry refrains from engaging in media arguments with someone who deliberately changes facts for personal objectives and masters the promotion of false championships that are based on wrong impressions leading to wrong conclusions,” it said.”

So that's how Cairo's Malcolm Tucker spins it. Needs a few more swear words, but... we're still light on BBC action, sue.

The convoy, organized by Viva Palestina, was unable to get to Gaza in time for the celebrations.

Or perhaps not: Your link says the party was in early December; yet the convoy wasn't supposed to reach Gaza till December 27th.

….unable to get to Gaza in time for the celebrations. The BBC doesn’t tell us this because they’re more concerned with interviewing the poor activists who have been beaten up.

Typical. The BBC gives us all the boring crap - riots, a dead Egyptian soldier, injuries, diplomatic stand-offs and so on - and fails to tell us the vital stuff: That the convoy missed a party it never intended to go to.

They’re also keen to tell us part of what Gorgeous George said.

They should deny him the oxygen of publicity. Keep his cigar consumption down, for one thing.

"It is completely unconscionable that 25% of our convoy should go to Israel and never arrive in Gaza."

A quote also used by Sky News, well known as a Jihad-friendly mouthpiece, among many others.

They didn’t bother to report the end of that statement, which was blatantly slanderous and far-fetched: “because nothing that goes to Israel ever arrives in Gaza.”

Excellent. Had the BBC used it we could have hammered them for broadcasting George's inflammatory guff.

And when they don't use it, we have them for failing to expose the same inflammatory guff. Win-win in every way!

Election 2010: The BBC Smear and Assassinate Cameron. Apparently.

Biased BBC's proud boast is that it Exposes The Reporting Bias Of The BBC. And the most fertile ground for bias-hunting must surely be the next General Election.

Today Biased BBC's Top Gun David Vance commended an email from a reader who'd spotted some egregious Labour propaganda on Five Live. It's an outstanding piece of analysis, only slightly flawed by an inability to listen to more than two words at a time. Oh, and a misunderstanding of the whole notion of bias. Otherwise, it's brilliant:

Radio Five just interviewed YouGov's Peter Kellner on the election - specifically his opinion on Cameron and the Tories.

Excellent. Top pollster.

Q. Why were Tories not doing better in the polls considering Labour's unpopularity?

Perhaps you'll share with us what the polls told him...

Obviously the real answer is Cameron's position on European Union and Global Warming.

Global Warming and the EU? Biased BBC's pet subjects to be sure, but is that YouGov's view?

Kellner's 'analysis' was that the Tories were still suffering from Major era, while Cameron remained very popular.

So he said. He also said people were blaming Labour more than the Conservatives for the expenses scandal.

A few sentences later he smeared Cameron.

Good grief… oh, hang on. He actually said that Labour attempts to paint Cameron as a toff were childish and trivial stuff in his personal view. However it did resonate with voters, so it was a legitimate tactical target if an unsavoury one.

BBC did not mention that Peter Kellner is married to a Labour Minister.

She is no longer a Labour Minister now that she's the EU Foreign Minister. But hey-ho.

How can BBC interview someone so biased on the election and keep the bias from the listener?

Perhaps you should have a word with those socialist softies at the Telegraph. Oh, and Mr Murdoch's lieutenants at The Sunday Times and Sky News. They all employ Mr Kellner's company to conduct their polling.

Well the answer to that is very simple - the BBC has no shame.

None at all. Asking the man who heads the Telegraph's polling company to discuss the next election is shocking.

I heard Nick Robinson earlier doing a similar assassination job on the Conservatives.

Somehow I doubt it, on the evidence of the above.

The election is ON and between now and polling day the BBC will do everything possible to ameliorate any Conservative advantage.

Because shafting the party most likely to win is a sure way for a public corporation to prosper for the next five years.

I am no fan of David Cameron but I can see how unfairly he and his party will be treated by the State Broadcaster. It amazes me that he is so meek and mild as to how he will treat the BBC when he gets into power.

Possibly because as a former broadcasting executive himself he understands the media slightly better than a stroppy yoghurt marketer from Antrim with an irrational hatred of The BBC.

I know what I would do, wouldn't you?

Is that before or after you bomb Iran and tear up the Good Friday peace treaty?

Snort. Die. Cheers!

Biased BBC's leading social commentator Martin gets 2010 off to a sparkling start:

To all beeboids I really hope you all get Cocaine laced with Cyanide this year.

Does make you wonder whether Martin's real identity belongs to one of those many humble souls honoured yesterday for services to the community. It's the least he deserves.

Intelligent, Incisive And Pointless

It's always good when fresh eyes survey a familiar landmark and confirm your own first impressions. Recent arrival burbette123 takes a good look today at Biased BBC and finds it inspiring, though with one tiny defect...

The people posting are intelligent, incisive, and informative.

Our feelings precisely.

It's the content that is great.

Keeps us riveted all year.

There is one problem, however.

Is it Martin ramping up his turd fascination again? Perhaps it's time for another David Vance Potty-Mouth Purge?

The bbc is still there in its present form,

Shameful that Britain's great broadcasting institution is still up and running.

taking our money, and spouting its verbal garbage.

We want it to take someone else's money and spout their garbage.

So what on earth is the point of BIASED BBC?

It's complicated, burbette123, but basically they'd all be annoying us on high streets and in bus queues if they didn't have a place to vent their impotent rage.