Showing posts with label Auntie Semitism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Auntie Semitism. Show all posts

Saturday, 6 February 2010

BBC News: Mein Kampf With Moving Pictures


It is universally accepted that few organisations are more anti-semitic than The BBC, a news service which practically stiff-arms a salute every time it thinks of Oswald Mosley.


Luckily, Biased BBC is on hand to keep tabs on the most egregious examples. Hats off to David Lee, who has discovered Swastikas where the rest of us might never spot them, in a report about rising attacks on British Jews.


Firstly they start off by putting the rise in quotation marks: UK anti-Semitic attacks 'rise'


Reported speech is such a tricky business.


Or to put in in simple English: "Those Jews can't be believed"


We're lucky they didn't call them Jewboys. Or worse.


And then they go further to drive home the message if the reader didn't already get it.


What could be worse than reported speech?


Their main photo is "something" purported to be bacon on some door handles.


The BBC actually says: "Bacon placed on the door handles of a Leeds synagogue."


"Thoese stupid Jews. Fussing about a little bit of dirt on a door handle. Can't they get a joke?"


Despicable. If only they had actually said it. Or even implied it. Which they didn't.


They cleverly leave the photo of "slay the Jew" grafitti towards the end,


Obviously anti-semitic. A Goebbels-worthy master-stroke and no mistake.


by which point the reader has already got their not sublime message.


That people are going around offending Jews and threatening to slay them?


"Some police forces calculate local trends for religiously motivated incidents, but there are no national figures for hate crimes against any specific group, such as Jews or Muslims."


Might be interesting to know, perhaps?


Hmm, was anybody speaking about Muslims?


Not as such. Though the Jewish Community Security Trust points out that the biggest increase in attacks was during the Gaza conflict.


Well, says the BBC reporter, we can't have those decent Muslims dressed up again as the bad guys, let's paint them as victims too. And then their final paragraph, the icing on the cake: "Last month, researchers at Exeter University called on Muslims to start counting their own figures in a similar fashion to the CST, saying there was evidence of an under-reporting of anti-Muslim hatred"


Not sure Oswald Mosley would be happy with that one. He might even dislike the implied tribute to the Jewish community's effectiveness in keeping tabs on prejudice so effectively.


The BBC, brilliantly and underhandedly anti semtic as ever, manage to turn a news item about how Jews suffering more at the hands of Muslims into an article about how much the "poor Muslims" are suffering and "look, nobody cares about them".


Outstanding. No evidence The BBC intended any such meaning. Or conveyed it. But it's a corker by Biased BBC standards.


But indeed, the BBC are not biased and not anti Semtic. Of couse not!


Par for the couse. You're not being paranoid, either. Of couse.


I've just re-read the two pieces and am shocked at the two demeaning examples of incidents which the BBC have chosen.


My God! There's more: Nuremberg was nothing on this.


One about a girl who was "surrounded by other pupils who chanted "death to Jews"" in the words of the BBC and the other about the "strips of bacon being placed on the door handles of a Leeds synagogue".


Distressing. But where's The BBC anti-semitism?


The (Evening Standard) tells a different story about the girl. "A 12-year-old girl, the only Jew at her school, was attacked by a mob of up to 20 fellow pupils who pulled her hair and chanted: “death to Jews, kill all Jews.”


The same story, just simplified... not a different one. On the other hand, the Standard illustrated its story with a picture of destruction in Gaza; The BBC with specific images of anti-semitism.


And surprise suprise, they also tell a different story about the bacom strips. They say "

In Yorkshire, strips of bacon were arranged in the shape of a star of David and stuck the fence of a home where a Jewish family lived with the word “Jewboy” written underneath."


The CST report covers both incidents. Not sure that an offensive gesture against one family is a greater or lesser evil than one against a whole religious congregation.


But not only do they play down the incidents, they completly ignore the more serious reports of the disabled person in a wheelchair who was rammed by a car with the driver yelling "Jew, Jew".


On the other hand, they linked to the detail of a disturbing story of a Jewish man attacked outside his own home.


Nor for that matter did they choose to report any of the other 124 violent assults or the 600 incidents of abusive behaviour.


Perhaps because news would grind to a halt if it reported absolutely every incident covered in each single publication.


The message of the BBC report: "Those troublesome Jews. Making a fuss about nothing"


Good, but do you mind if we refine it?


Biased BBC: Making a fuss about nothing.


Monday, 16 November 2009

Never Give A Jew The Torah


It goes without saying that Biased BBC sets the standard for evidence-based criticism. But sometimes even B-BBC outdoes itself. All praise to the saintly All Seeing Eye for this devastating critique of BBC vileness:


Did anyone catch the recent "Desert Island Discs" featuring Anthony Julius who was Lady Diana`s lawyer?


Sounds as if you did.


He had said that he was Jewish and loved English Literature enough to have wanted for some time to teach it.


Excellent. If a little dull.


At the end she presumed to offer him a copy of the Torah - and he protested saying that he wanted the full King James Version of the Bible so he would still have access to the beauties of the New Testament.


Is that the time? And I haven't yet walked the dog.


The BBC is full of this anti-Christian presumption.


Murdoch…Walkies! Sorry, what did you say?


The BBC is full of this anti-Christian presumption.


The bastards! Offering a Jewish man his own religious scripture? (Are we sure this is out of order?)


I assume that Kirsty and team did not already know that the Torah IS the Old Testament


Oi! Young! Noooo! (Is it possible that they thought some Jews might find the New Testament a bit tricky since Jesus is not actually their Messiah?)


but are they not commiting (by their lights!) the cardinal sins of stereotyping and patronising a Jewish person to presume that he might automatically take the Torah?


Stereotyping for sure. Unlike assuming that everyone wants to take The Bible in the first place.


Julius deserves credit for being so forbearing of the caricaturing!


As a lawyer he'd know that The Religious Persecution (Assuming Jews Follow Their Own Faith) Act 1973 gives him full redress.


Add this to the "Good Rebellion, Sir" stance that they take as a matter of course with this question at the end.


That's why they ask, of course. No, really.


A David Walliams and the like are somewhat lionised as and when they refuse the offer of the Bible by the admiring Kirsty and her ilk


She takes her orders from Satan. That's why they chose her.


...seems to be desired even to show how much against "The Man" they all are!


Not sure that makes sense. Is this the same BBC which Biased BBC routinely accuses of institutional anti-semitism, by the way?


Note: This item was submitted by a reader and will be updated with attribution when he/she confirms how they want it to appear.


Possibly too embarrassed. We can but hope.


If you spot anything you think merits inclusion please contact us here.


But try not to be so desperate.


Religious guidance: All Seeing Eye is the progenitor of the sacred …Is A Cunt blog, whose Godliness and sublime use of English are often remarked upon.