Killing In The Name Of: Your Home Contents Policy.

An Englishman's home is his castle. And the home of a Biased BBC chap comes equipped with means of lethal assault, which an incoming Tory Government will apparently encourage him to use on burglars (and presumably anyone else who strays within his own personal Green Zone without prior security clearance). Leading social commentator Martin has discovered that the BBC Quislings are not being supportive enough of such sensible measures.

Typical BBC.

Yeah. But how?

On the attack over the Tories plan to change the law on criminals getting a good kicking.

Are we sure that's Tory policy?

Radio 5 phone in has some fat ugly female beeboid spouting her left wing liberal garbage

Are there any BBC women who do not fit that bill?

spouting her left wing liberal garbage about 'poor criminals'

They wouldn't need to be criminals if they were rich. Be fair.

and (spouting about) all those nasty right wing callers thinking it's OK to kill someone who might only be in your home to get a bit of cash for some smack.

Heroin would be a valid medical reason to burgle you, so no to murder on that. But if they need money to pay off a loan shark, then you can kill them. So long as you do it painfully.

I have something called Google which if you type in the beeboids name gives you pictures of them. Anyway it was Shelagh fogherty, she is fat and very ugly.

Valid grounds for summary execution in itself.

Can't wait for the Sharia to come into force here. Female beeboids kept at home, beaten and raped on a daily basis. They will love that.

And so will you, Martin. Be honest.

The Gibbets Are Coming

Andrew South London has been filling Biased BBC readers in on his extermination plans for the BBC hierarchy. Last month, he promised that the corporation's head of news would meet her fate on piano wire.

Now, it seems, she won't be the only one:

As each day passes the BBC become more of an object of ridicule

Par for the course for stinking cesspits of bias.

I actually believe so... from scanning all the media output daily, and counting the increasing frequency of voices across a wide range of opinion that have seized on how our national state broadcaster looks increasingly marooned,

Flash floods around Shepherds Bush the other night. But not that bad really...

cast as East Germany in the 1960-70s's, reciting tractor production statistics.

Is that something to do with The Archers? Or maybe Farming Today?

Its profligate expenses, five of the ten largest public-sector pension pots in Britain, its rejection of FOI despite its compulsory public funding, its Obama-echo, its Warmist sheep-bleating, its disgraceful Palli-shill,

That's quite a charge sheet. Even if a lot of it is in your strange Biased BBC dialect. Can we start with the sheep? Is this going to be like The Silence Of The Lambs?

its daily vile management of news to promote Gordon

Always been a Thomas man myself. He was a useful engine.

or put off the day the lamposts of White City are all full.

Gulp! Wouldn't the News Boss's execution be enough? Teach the others a lesson they'll never forget? All that FOIObamaEchoSheepWarmingShilpaPalling... they'll bitterly regret it. For sure.

A great organisation laid low by socialism,

If swine flu doesn't get them first.

the mental-illness-of-choice of the greasy-pole climbing classes

I wouldn't be so hard on yourself. You're just...stressed. Have a lie down

...until now. Its coming to an end Beeboids, and you know it.

Is it piano wire all round, then? Or just for the News bods?

Taking Out The Jihadi Trash

It is a disgrace that the British Security services might have used information obtained under torture... No, wait: The real disgrace is that the BBC keeps mentioning it. And Biased BBC wants it to stop.

The voice of reason, David Vance, takes it very seriously:

in the aftermath of Islamistan murdering THOUSANDS of people in the USA, British security and intelligence services should have realised that their immediate priority was to ensure the UK did..not get involved in rendition or become complicit in any way with the "torture" of alleged Jihadists.

What really irritates me is not just the BBC's relentless undermining of the work undertaken by our Intelligence Services but the fact that ever since 9/11, the State Broadcaster has chosen to operate as a propaganda channel for every piece of Jihadist trash that has gotten as far as a microphone.

David

Wise words. As ever.

Perhaps we could clear things up for our security services, so that in future there will be no doubt that they always acted ethically and within the law. After all, we want the Jihadi Trash to understand what a powerful notion the democratic rule of law really is. Don't we?

Anyway, I propose a Biased-BBC Rules of Engagement to be offered to MI5, MI6, Special Branch and whoever else would find it useful in batting off annoying BBC people.

Perhaps Biased-BBC readers can help:

Do we want our security services to fit in with any of the following when questioning suspects:

1. The Convention On Human Rights
2. British Law
3. Sharia
4. Jude Law
5. None of the above

Who could best help our security services obtain information?

1. 118.com
2. The News of the World's phone-hackers
3. Pakistani Intelligence
4. The gimp-master in Pulp Fiction
5. The Spanish Inquisition (No-one ever expects The Spanish Inquisition)

How should British agents act whilst in the presence of torture?

1. Look the other way.
2. Cough nervously and hope they get the point
3. Do the Telegraph crossword and ask for a summary at the end.
4. Pick up a cattle prod and say: "Next man in!"

What torture would be tolerable?

1. Toenails out.
2. Teeth drilled. No anaesthetic.
3. Electric shocks to genitalia.
4. Waterboarding. (Or snowboarding. In summer)
5. Reading Atlas Shrugged posts 24/7.

Would be useful to have replies before the Queen's Speech. Time to show our proud support for HM Intelligence!

The British Race War 2009: Souvenir Issue

Few things get sections of Biased BBC more, um, aroused than the prospect of giving Muslims a swift comeuppance. So the news of a confrontation between anti-Islamic protestors and anti-fascist groups in the Midlands brought forth hallelujahs:

Anton was in apocalyptic mode:

And so the conflict begins.

Can you try not to sound quite so end-of-days? It scares the unconverted.

I wonder which side the BBC will take?

We can only hope for a late conversion to the boot-boy cause.

Cassandra long ago embraced his/her inner BNP member - (s)he once bravely suggested that Biased BBC’s Jewish readers should be friends with Nick Griffin's party. This time, (s)he has a scoop:

While British troops fight the islamist heathens wasting billions of pounds and hundreds of lives the huge increase in hostile islamist colonists goes unreported and unoticed.


Except by you. Well done.

The islamic colonists hate us like poison, they view us as not human and make no mistake about this if they manage to gain the whip hand over us they will treat us like dogs!



Try not to sugar it….

when they reach a critcal mass there will be civil war and strife as surely as night follows day, we are heading for a Balkans style nightmare and whats worse is that we can see it coming

Wasn’t the original Cassandra doomed never to be believed? Any chance you might be exceeding your own credibility here?

nightwatch is predicting a BBC cover-up before it’s even happened:

watch the attached video quickly before the beeb delete it.



I’ve got it on loop. Mustn’t waste a second before Big Brother Beeb orders us to forget we ever saw it.

It has a Muslim talking about people condemning Islam as wicked religion".....that isnt anti-fascist.....that is blatant flag-waving....of the green kind.


I wish Jonathan Porritt would stay out of this.


...which culminates with a muslim woman chanting "OUR-STREETS, OUR-STREETS"!!

I’d stick another exclamation mark or two on that. Also, I fear that the Consolidated Taxation (Oi Islamics, Don’t Think You’ve Got A Single Fucking Stake In This Country) Act has not been as successful as we had hoped.

in the end the BBC leave us in ignorance on these anonymous people!

At no point is it mentioned these are "militant islamists" or any kind of commentary by the BBC

Possibly because these are raw news pictures?

piggy kosher moves the story on. It’s no longer a bad-tempered demo. It’s apartheid....

The red line is crossed when no- go areas can be allowed to develop in mainland Britain in the first decade of the 21st century, based purely on religious difference and an apparent complete antipathy to the culture and religions of the host country.
Wake up.

No offence. I wasn't sleeping. I was just blinking slowly. But hasn’t Islam long been one of the religions of the, erm, host country?

Robert S. McNamara speaks for many.

I don't watch much - if any TV - these days for the obvious reasons,

Good man. I find if I concentrate hard and place my fingers just so I can still find out what the bastards are doing.

but isn't Shappi Khorsandi the woman they pushed forth into the public's gaze following 9/11

No

to try to get us to ignore the life and times of Muhammad, the Qur'an, the actions by Muslims in the 1400 years since Islams invention, and generally take leave of all our senses in order to come to the conclusion that Islam in a useful, progressive, peaceful, tolerant ideology?

As she’s proud of being a Humanist and wasn’t raised in the religion, I doubt it.

Or is that some other no-discernible-talent nonentity given prominence purely because of her skin tone/ethnicity?

Something tells me you don’t want an answer to that.

Martin has been doing the maths. Well, having a damn good guess, anyway...

I've always sais that I believe that the real number of Mzzie's festering here is nearer 5 million (the population of Scotland)

That’s based on?

We know that the census is never filled out correctly, that also when it comes to immigration the Government only ever counts the head of the family. That excludes the 4 wives, 20 kids and endless grandparents and cousins.



Aaaah. OK.

This Country is finished. Within 20 years the call to prayer will be a legal requirement for us all.

At least the homosexuals at the BBC can relax, their rights will be well protected under Sharia law.

Which might be a reason why an organisation which Biased BBC says is over-endowed with gays is unlikely to be ushering in a British Islamic revolution… another tenet of B-BBC belief.

boy blue has muscled in on Cassandra’s prophecy patch…

You can be sure that none of the chattering classes will stick around long enough to witness the inevitable social collapse.

Jeez. Why do you guys never predict anything useful? Like the winner of next year’s Derby?

They would have long fled to their little bolt holds in some lily-white enclave of rural France, or places further a field.



My bolt hold is easily accessible via EasyJet.

Nope, it’ll be left to us, the ordinary folk, to face the music for what these bastards have done to our country.

Relax. It’ll be something soothing by Cat Stevens. He goes down well at the mosque.

The Secret Of Happiness: Rape

Fritigern has found the secret of human happiness, and thanks to a boisterous Biased BBC debate on crime, he shares it with us. (Crime is all the BBC's fault, by the way).

The key ingredients to perfect bliss are - and this may surprise you - violence, rape and robbery. (Perhaps not a surprise that Fritigern's name is borrowed from a warrior-leader of the 4th Century Goths.)

A year or so ago I was made really happy

Good for you. You deserve it.

when I read that a Member of the Scottish Parliament had been beaten up...

Ah.... Did he owe you money?

...beaten up by low life from a council estate.

Perhaps he owed them money?

I just wish that our criminal fraternity would attack, rape and burgle

That would make a change. Them being criminals and all.

attack, rape and burgle MPs , MSps, councillors, beeboids

Glad you got the Beeboids in. They're the worst.

but most of all Judges, magistrates, sheriffs and lawyers.

That's a lot of rape and pillage. Should we sub-contract it to the Danes?

Perhaps then the powers that be might protect the ordinary citizens from the depredations of the sub-human scum who infest this country.

Audacious....but...but...

Can't quite put my finger on it, but encouraging sub-human scum to attack, burgle and, um, rape thousands of people might have limitations as a crime-reduction strategy.

Can we get back to you on that?

The Ba!!s To Say It

If democrisy means anything, it's that every opinion gets it's place on the adgenda. However controversial. To do anything else would be hypocrasy. Which is what the BBC do.

If there's one thing that Biased BBC wins hands down, it's giving open house to interesting ideas. Unlike the BBC's leftie-riddled Have Your Say.

Stubaby writes:

I've just had this comment rejected by BBC's Have Your Say.
"How should we deal with drug dealers?
Cut their bo!!ocks off. This will act as a real deterrent and, even if they do re-offend, their children won't."

If you'd left in the bit about using a rusty razor, you'd be in. Sure of it.

This was a serious comments, worthy of consideration.

It's not you. It's them.

As usual they don't publish comments that do not suit their adgenda.

Which is to keep drug dealers fertile. Typical Beeboid!

Not only that, but they manipulate the results by delaying comment that they don't reject (but don't really agree with). They do this so that comments they do favour are displayed in the key positions to be voted for (at the top of the "Most Recent" or "Recommended" lists )

Stop. I'm losing faith. In everything.

Thankfully, Heads On Poles is around to offer support.

Just been reading that stubaby.

Thank God. A glimmer of hope. Even in this darkness.

Very liberal is the best that I can say about it and bent is probably the most accurate.

Accuracy is our byword. Liberal and bent it is.

Bet they don't publish my comment...

Remember to put in the bit about the rusty razor. Or the hungry piranha.

Either would be good.

Rope's too good for 'em

There will be no hiding place when the Biased BBC reckoning comes. And we know who'll be first on the list, thanks to Andrew South London.

(Remember when reading the following that Andrew was goaded beyond endurance not only by West Country coppers embracing head scarves but also by the BBC's scandalous lack of respect for Sarah Palin.)

Andrew South London writes:

Remember who is responsible

We will. Oh, we will.

when they hand out the piano wire:

Piano wire?

Helen Boaden, Director of BBC News.

Wouldn't, you know, rope suffice?

when they hand out the piano wire: Helen Boaden, Director of BBC News.

Mmmmm. That it?

Her gushing Wiki omits to mention the salary you pay this witch

Probably for the best, considering the above.

but its published elsewhere as between £310,000 and £340,000. Ahem, plus expenses no doubt. Doesn't the liberal left public sector pay well?

Oh, but she'll regret every penny of it when the tumbrils roll. Every penny.

Avon & Somerset: The Final Confrontation

Biased BBC's star writer David Vance has been working himself up into a fine fury all day about the Foreign Secretary suggesting talks with the Taliban. And the BBC reporting of it. Naturally.

Then his co-conspirator George R hits a raw nerve when he brings the shocking news that Avon & Somerset Police will be issuing headscarves to female officers when they visit local mosques.

George R doubtless means well. But it was a bad move. Vance is headed for the keyboard. With extreme prejudice:

George R,

Having read the drivel from the likes of Medicated and Gosh, I think you are right. There are plenty who would sooner live under the joys of Islamic rule than support confronting and utterly defeating them.

Time to buddy up with Freedom-fighter Vance:

David

I too was shocked that police officers in the West Country might try to show some courtesy when entering local mosques.

As ever you sum it up brilliantly:

There are plenty who would sooner live under the joys of Islamic rule ...

I know it's only cops visiting the local mosque, but I think we'll all forgive a bit of overstatement...

There are plenty who would sooner live under the joys of Islamic rule than support confronting and utterly defeating them.

Crikey! I thought the coppers would be dropping off Neighbourhood Watch packs, not confronting and utterly defeating them!

I know we're all a bit bothered about the Islamics, but is it really essential that we start the war in Somerset?

Right Now?

And is the RAF all right about softening up the Yeovil mosque with a few bunker-busters beforehand?

It looks perilously close to some quality housing...

Who could imagine Muslims from Somerset wanting to carry out acts of Jihad? Next thing, the vast right wing conspiracy will be suggesting that we need to keep a bit of a wary eye on parts of Leeds. Thank goodness that Islamic terrorism hasn't taken any British lives otherwise some might view your nauseating complacency as evidence of your own moral degeneracy...oh, hang on.....

Righty-ho. Will you call the RAF? Or shall I?